I\'m having trouble understanding why the code below #include <string> #include <vector> #include <map>
After getting an answer to this question I discovered there are two valid ways to typedef a function pointer.
This question already has answers here: Closed 11 years ago. Possible Duplicate: Error with address of parenthesized member function
I\'m using a C library inside my C++ app. The library has a function with the following signature: void awe_webview_set_callback_js_callback(awe_webview* webview, void (*callback)(awe_webview* caller
I have another question related to the safe bool idiom: typedef void (Testable::*bool_type)() const;// const necessary?
This is basically a question about the readability, style, performance of 2 different approaches to creating/passing a functor that points to a member method from within a class constructor/method.
I have a class Test with a peculiar data structure. A member of class Test is a std::map where the key is a std::string and the mapped value is a struct defined as follows:
I want to stop the warning server.cpp:823: warning: converting from \'void* (ClientHandler::)()\' to \'void ()(void)\'
If you have a struct like this one struct A { void func(); }; and a reference like this one A& a; you can 开发者_如何学Cget a pointer to its func method like this:
this just has me stumped, so I thought I\'d query here: I have a class as follows: class MyClass { public:
加载中,请稍侯......