I was trying to use an inner class of the super type, which was using generics. And got that strange error above.
Consider this code: namespace foo {} class A { class B { }; friend int foo::bar( B& ); }; namespace foo { int bar( A::B& )
Let\'s say I have: public class A { public A() { ... } ... public class B { public B() { ...开发者_运维知识库
I want to create something that resembles an extendable Enum (understanding extending Enums isn\'t possible in Java 6).
public enum Days { SUNDAY, MONDAY, TUESDAY, WEDNESDAY, THURSDAY, FRIDAY, SATURDAY; public enum WeekDays{ MONDAY,
I know how to get this code to work, but I\'m curious why the compiler is not able to figure out that the call is to the outer class method:
In final variable passed to anonymous class via constructor, Jon Skeet mentioned that variables are passed to the anonymous class instance via an auto-generated constructor. Why would I not be able to
In the following code: public class Main { Emp globalEmp; public void aMethod() { final int stackVar = 10; globalEmp = new Emp()
I wonder why smalltalk doesn\'t make use of java-style inner class. This mechanism effectively allows you to define a new instance of a new class, on-the-fly, where you need it, when you need it. It c
I have a Class Aouter, This Aouter cl开发者_如何学Cass has 2 inner classes namely Binner,Cinner. My doubt is if Binner class had been changed so Cinner class also should be compiled and moved to serve
加载中,请稍侯......