The title of the question pretty much says it all. Will static variables marked with the [ThreadStaticAttribute] get messed up if you use ExecutionContext.SuppressFlow() to cancel the propagation of t
I was wondering how TransactionScope class works to keep the transaction between different method calls (without the need to pass it as a parameter) and I came to this doubt. I\'ve got two considerati
I\'ve written small test program and was surprised why lock {} solution performs faster than lock-free but with [ThreadStatic] attribute over static variable.
Because of Thread Agility in ASP.Net, ThreadStatic is not an appropriate mechanism to use in web appl开发者_如何学编程ications for segregating static property access from one request to the next.
I am calling from one piece of my code through several layers of 3rd party code, and the call surfaces back into my code at some point by callin开发者_StackOverflow中文版g some code I\'ve written.
Update: as I should have expected, the community\'s sound advice in response to this question was to \"measure it and see.\" chibacity posted an answer with some really nice tests that did this for me
I have a component that needs to store static values fore each thread. It\'s a general component that can be used in many scenarios and not only in ASP.NET.
I recently read this post about poor performance of fields marked T开发者_如何转开发hreadStatic - they\'re apparently 60x slower than normal field access. Does .NET 4\'s ThreadLocal< T > perform an
With the ThreadStatic attribute I can have a static member of a class with one instance of the object per thread. This is really handy for achieving thread safety using types of objects that don\'t gu
Is there a way to make newly-spawned threads inherit the values of ThreadStatic state (or something like it) on their parent threads?I would like to use this (or something like it) to implement \"dyna
加载中,请稍侯......