If a problem X (decision problem) is known to be NP-Complete, and proven to be reduced to problem Y in polynomialtime, can you then say problem Y is NP-Complete?
I working on a combinatorial optimization problem that I suspect is NP-hard, and a genetic algorithm has been working well with our dataset.We\'re a research group and plan to publish our results in o
I wrote this program to test how long it would take to \"solve\" the set-cover problem. using System; using System.Collections.Generic;
(I\'ve changed the details of this question to avoid NDA issues. I\'m aware that if taken literally, there are better ways to run this theoretical company.)
I volunteered to write a program to schedule parent-t开发者_开发技巧eacher conferences. The principal wants parents to select 3 possible datetimes to visit their english and math teacher (at the same
Input: Graph G Output: several independent sets, so that the membership of a node to all independent sets is unique. A node therefore has no connections to any node in its own set. Here is an example
I want to break a domain name into constituent words and numbers e.g. iamadomain11.com = [\'i\', \'am\', \'a\', \'domain\', \'11\']
It's difficult to tell what is being asked here. This question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical andcannot be reasonably answered in its current form. For help clari
First off, let me say that this is not homework (I am an A-Level student, this is nothing close to what we problem solve (this is way harder)), but more of a problem I\'m trying to suss out to improve
This problem came up in the real world, but I\'ve translated it into a more generic \"textbook-like\" formulation. I suspect it is NP, but I\'m particularly interested in knowing if it has a name or i
加载中,请稍侯......