I have the following NP-complete problem: Given: a set of locations in a N × N field, a set of m nodes, and
I have a problem which is a pretty clear instance of the subset sum开发者_StackOverflow problem: \"given a list of Integers in the range [-65000,65000], the function returns true if any subset of the
If I have a decision problem开发者_开发技巧 A, and wish to show that it is NP-complete.Is it enough to prove that another NP-complete problem polynomially reduces to A, or must I show that another NP-
The definition of NP-complete is A problem开发者_高级运维 is NP-complete if it belongs to class NP
I know it has been proven NP-complete, and that\'s ok. I\'m currently solving it with branch and bound where I set the initial upper limit at the number of multiplications it would take the normal bin
I have studied many about reduction but I have a bad problem in it: I take this from CLRS : \" ... by “reducing” solving problem A to solving problem B, we use the “easiness” of B to prove the “
I encountered many problems that can be formulated as graph problem. It is in general NP-hard but sometimes the graph can be proved to be planar.
It\'s quite easy to see that n! grows slower than almost anything to the N power (say, 100^N) and so, if a problems is considered NP complete and one happened upon a n! algorithm that approximates the
I have this assignment to prove that this problem: Finite alphabet £, two strings x,y € £*, and a positive integer K.Is
Is it possible to cast any subgraph isomorphism problem as a subset sum problem so that it is possible to use dynamic programming techniques av开发者_如何学Goailable for solving the subset sum problem