I was solving some problems on Project Euler and I mentioned that I always wrap short methods in proc functions. I asked myself \"Why?\". The answer was \"I don\'t know. Maybe because it is short?\".
I could use some help on this one, given this code: result1, result2, result3 = do_stuff { method_1 method_2
I know that this code may be not quite correct: def print_string(&str) puts str end print_string{\"Abder-Rahman\"}
This question already has answers here: Closed 11 years ago. Possible Duplicate: What's the difference between a proc and a lambda in Ruby?
Just when I thought I had my head wrapped around procs & lambdas this happens... irb> x = Proc.new{|name| \"Hello #{name}\"}
The date_validator in its examples has a comment: Using Proc.new prevents production cache issues Does it mean, that everywhere in my code, where I use current time related methods (Time.now, 1.day
I recently tried to do something akin to this: a = \"some string\" b = Proc.new{ upcase } a.inst开发者_StackOverflow中文版ance_eval b
I want to replace the definition of \"proc N\" with a proc of the same name and calling conventions, but with a little extra error detection code.
I lifted the following example from Josh Susser def strip_accents params thunk = lambda do |key,value| case value
For user convenience and more clean code I would like to write a class that can be used like this: Encoder::Theora.encode do
加载中,请稍侯......