According to POSIX, It shall be safe to destroy an initialized condition variable upon which no threads are currently blocked.
I\'m implementing pthread condition variables (based on Linux futexes) and I have an idea for avoiding the \"stampede effect\" on pthread_cond_broadcast with process-shared condition variables. For no
Suppose a condition variable is used in a situation where the signaling thread modifies the state affecting the truth value of the predicate and calls pthread_cond_signal without holding the mutex ass
I have yet to find a clear explanation of the differences between Condition and Event classes in the threading module.Is there a clear use case where one would be more helpful than the other?All the e
Boost version - 1.47 I can not find boost::interprocess::interprocess_sharable_mutex, but it looks like it is forward declared. Is this really supported ?
I have a situation where thread 1 is waiting on a condition variable A, whi开发者_JAVA百科ch should be woken up by thread 2. Now thread 2 is waiting on a condition variable B , which should be woken u
I am trying to make a windows-version of a program written for Linux, in C++. For the program to be thread-safe, I use pthread_cond_t and pthread_cond_wait in the Linux version. These functions use a
Regarding this: How To Use Condition Variable Say we have number of consumer threads that execute such code (copied from the referenced page):
The Linux Programming Interface book has a piece of code (producer/consumer) to show how condition variable works:
I am trying to synchronize two thread (working on the same C++ map) using the Boost library. I must tell that I am not an expert in C++ and I find the boost documentation quite hard to understand.
加载中,请稍侯......