we have been using ThreadLocal so far to carry some data so as to not clutter the API. However below are some of issues of using thread local that which I dont like
I was commenting on an answer that thread-local storage is nice and recalled another informative discussion about exceptions where I supposed
开发者_如何学JAVAI am using ACE threads and need each thread to have its own int member. Is that possible?ACE calls this \"Thread Specific Storage\".Check this out: ACE_TSS.That\'s about all I know ab
I have below piece code which runs on JDK5 private static ThreadLocal<String> messages = new ThreadLocal<String>();
Is there a good, platform-agnostic way to implement a variable that\'s local to both a thread and a class instance, i.e. if you have T threads and I class instances, you have TxI instances of that var
Naively, I expected a ThreadLocal to be some kind of WeakHashMap of Thread to the value type. So I was a little puzzled when I learned that the values of a ThreadLocal is actually saved in a map in th
I\'m using ThreadLocal variables (through Clojure\'s vars, but the following is the same for plain ThreadLocals in Java) and very often run into the issue that I can\'t be sure that a certain code pat
When Using a thread-local database connection, closure of the connection is required when the thread exists.
加载中,请稍侯......