Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Update the quest开发者_Go百科ion so it can be answered with facts and citations
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
So I know that when it comes to user stories scenarios, being specific is a good thing. However, I frequently come to a point where I ask myself: How specific should my scenario be?
User stories are traditionally written as expression \"As a [User Type] I want [feature] so that [some benefit]\". In the books and online resources [User Type] typically correspond to a role of a hum
I was wondering what the thinking is in regards to using User Stories to describe automated, scheduled, or reactive functionality. For 开发者_Python百科example, what do you do when you have something
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Over开发者_开发问答flow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
How do you handle user stories/acceptance tests that have long chains like this one, where the Then/W开发者_如何转开发hen mingle together?Is it best to split this into a separate acceptance test where
I am trying to learn how to use BDD for our de开发者_如何学编程velopment process and I sometimes end-up writing things that implies a UI design, so for brand new development or new features, the UI do
加载中,请稍侯......