Provided thatI have a project factory Factory.define :project do |p| p.sequence(:title){ |n| "project #{n} title"}
Similar to the problem described here: http://rpheath.com/posts/411-how-to-use-factory-girl-with-rspec
I have a constraint and a validation placed on t开发者_开发问答he guid field so that each is unique.The problem is, with the factory definition that I have below, I can create only one user instance,
rake cucumber --trace output: /usr/bin/ruby1.8 -I \"/home/vadim/.bundle/ruby/1.8/gems/cucumber-0.8.3/lib:lib\" \"/home/vadim/.bundle/ruby/1.8/gems/cucumber-0.8.3/bin/cucumber\"--profile default
I\'m still a working on learning RSpec so I\'m sorry if completely overlooked something... I\'m writing a test for a recipe that has many ingredients.The ingredients are actually added as a percent (
I am trying to test my update action in Rails with this: context \"on PUT to :update\" do setup do @countdown = Factory(:countdown)
I have installed both shoulda and factory_girl, I can run shoulda just fine, but when I add this: require \'factory_girl\'
I\'m able to get my Gemfile how I like it: # Gemfile source \"http:开发者_如何学运维//gemcutter.org\"
I am using Factory Girl but like the machinist syntax. So I wonder, if there is any way creating a named blueprint for class, so that I can have something like that:
When building the following factory: Factory.define :user do |f| f.sequence(:name) { |n| \"foo#{n}\" } f.resume_t开发者_运维百科ype_id { ResumeType.first.id }
加载中,请稍侯......