Named Blueprints with factory_girl
I am using Factory Girl but like the machinist syntax. So I wonder, if there is any way creating a named blueprint for class, so that I can have something like that:
User.blueprint(:no_discount_user) do
admin false
hashed_password "226bc1eca359a09f5f1b96e26efeb4bb1aeae383"
is_trader false
name "foolish"
salt "21746899800.223524289203464"
end
User.blueprint(:discount_user) do
admin false
hashed_password "226bc1eca359a09f5f1b96e26efeb4bb1aeae383"
is_trader true
name "deadbeef"
salt "21746899800.223524289203464"
discount_rate { DiscountRate.make(:rate => 20.00) }
end
DiscountRate.bluep开发者_如何学Gorint do
rate {10}
not_before ...
not_after ...
end
Is there a way making factory_girl with machinist syntax acting like that? I did not find one. Help appreciated.
Thx in advance Jason
Yes you can. require blueprint syntaxe
require 'factory_girl/syntax/blueprint'
Sham.email {|n| "#{n}@example.com" }
User.blueprint do
name { 'Billy Bob' }
email { Sham.email }
end
User.make(:name => 'Johnny')
If you concerned with DRYness of your tests, you may consider active_factory plugin, that i've created. In it you could define a factory like this:
factory :discount_user, :class => User do
admin false
hashed_password "226bc1eca359a09f5f1b96e26efeb4bb1aeae383"
is_trader true
name "deadbeef"
salt "21746899800.223524289203464"
discount_rate { DiscountRate.make(:rate => 20.00) }
end
Another option would be just 'add discount' inside your test:
models { discount_rate - user - ... }
It would create association between the two models. Thus you can keep your specs DRY while avoiding creating a lot of factories.
Sorry, if I'm not answering exactly your question
精彩评论