I have used auto properties a lot but I have gone more and more away from that setting up classes with readonly backing fields initialized in the constru开发者_开发百科ctor. I remove all setters and o
I ran across this issue today and was able to determine that, when doing code cleanup, R# will not convert properties from having backing fields to auto properties in classes that are decorated with t
It's difficult to tell what is being asked here. This question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical andcannot be reasonably answered in its current form. For help clari
Why is this: public string Foo {get;set;} considered better than thi开发者_如何学运维s: public string Foo;
This question already has answers here: How do I write private set auto-properties in VB 10? 开发者_JAVA百科
What\'s the easiest/straight-forward way of setting a default value for a C# public property? // how do I set a default for this?
Is there a noticeable performance difference when using fields instead of auto properties?What about if I\'m deserializing an array of say, 1000 JSON objects with 5 properties each?
Apparently VS 2008 does not allow setting a breakpoint just on the setter of an auto-property. I.e. if I define an auto-property like this:
Is there any way (perhaps via add-in) that anyone knows to easily list or visualize the fields (and auto-properties) of a class in Visual Studio 2008 SP1 (standalone or with ReSharper 4.5)?
I have a big library written in C++ and someone created an interface to use it in python (2.6) in an automatic way. Now I have a lot of classes with getter and setter methods. Really: I hate them.
加载中,请稍侯......