I am referencing this answer (emphasis mine): Have a look at the ContractClass and ContractClassFor attributes. This allows you to write classe开发者_Python百科s with the code contracts in separate
Consider the following code: int SomeField; void Foo([Pure] Func<int, object> getData) { Contract.Requires(getData != null);
I have started using Code Contracts and have found that it makes it difficult to immediately spot the \'guts\' of a method.
I have a situation I don\'t know how it\'s supposed to be solved. According to the user manual section 3, a contractmethod, i.e. Require or Ensure, is not allowed in overriding methods/properties or i
I just started 开发者_如何学JAVAusing code contracts in my project. However, I have a problem with my repository implementation, which queries my database using the Entity Framework.
I got really captivated by code contracts introduced in .NET 4 (though with the help o开发者_如何学JAVAf DevLabs). But one fine print cooled me off quite a bit. Here is what it says:
I\'ve got this code: return session.Query<Payment>() .OrderBy(payment => payment.Created) .Skip((page - 1)*pageSize)
Here\'s a simple graph manipulation method which I have decorated with Code Contracts. The ensures claim won\'t prove but I can\'t see why!I believe it claims that after calling Remove(), either the
In my code i do this a lot: myfunction (parameter p) { if(p == null) return; } How would I replace this with a code contract?
Are there any reasons why you wouldn\'t use Code Contracts to enforce business rules? Imagine you have a User class that represents a single user of a system and defines actions that can be performed