Is there any way to put contracts on automatically implemented properties in .NET? (And how if the answe开发者_Go百科r is \'Yes\')?
after some thinking I have concluded that postconditions in methods are useful only when imposed on the return value, ref and out parameters, but not on fields, neither static nor on any instance. The
I\'ve got this code: public class MyCollection : ICollection<string> { private readonly ICollection<string> _inner = new Collection<string>();
So I have a very simple class with one string as property. This string has to have a certain pattern. I\'m trying to enforce this using code contracts. The class looks something like this:
In a class of mine, I have a private field of type ExpandoObject. The field is initialized in the constructior (this.expected = new ExpandoObject()), so I\'m confident that it will never be null.
I\'m a fan of the \"fail early\"开发者_运维问答 strategy and want to check that methods params have correct values for example. In Java I\'d use something like Guava:
开发者_Go百科If I have an interface A and interface B that extends A, can I create a contract class BContract that inherits AContract?
I might say I\'m getting quite familiar with Code Contracts: I\'ve read and understood most of the user manual and have been using them for quite a while now, but I still have questions. When I search
I am using C# 4.0 and Code Contracts and I have my own custom GameRoomCollection : IEnumerable<GameRoom>.
I\'m tying to understand Code Contracts advantages. I\'ve wrote following code (from PEX + Code Contract introduction) to dig it.