I have a ThreadPoolExecutor that is constructed with an unbounded queue (LinkedBlockingQueue) and a core and max pool size set to the number of cpus (say 4).
I am trying to execute a simple calculation (it calls Math.random() 10000000 times). Surprisingly running it in simple method perfo开发者_运维技巧rms much faster than using ExecutorService.
I started learning java and I am开发者_高级运维 now at the concurrency chapter. After reading some stuff about concurrency I tried an example of my own.
i have been advised to use Executors.newCachedThreadPool() which will be able to solve problems when over-spawning threads.
I\'m interested in using ScheduledExecutorService to spawn mu开发者_如何学运维ltiple threads for tasks if task before did not yet finish. For example I need to process a file every 0.5s. First task st
I\'ve got a problem that\'s been driving me nuts for a while and I need to consult your collective wisdom.
Please look at my following code.... private static final int NTHREDS = 10; ExecutorService executor = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(NTHREDS);
I am on windows XP and I have problems with new Python 3.2 futures module. It seems I am unable to get ProcessPoolExecutor to work.
I\'d like to stop an Executor from running any more Future objects even if they have been submitted to the Executor.
I know that generally injector should be used only once in all application (on startup). But i have following use case. I inject task implementation for Executor, and then inside that task i have depe