I\'m trying to achieve following: class A { def foo() { \"foo\" } } class B { def bar() { \"bar\" } } A.开发者_运维问答mixin B
I want to use the mixin feature o开发者_运维技巧f groovy to import methods as \"class(static) methods\" instead of instance methods. When i use mixin even though i have a static method in my mixin cla
In Ruby, there\'s Modules a开发者_如何学Pythonnd you can extend a class by \"mixing-in\" the module.
I\'m working on a module that, among other things, will add some generic \'finder\' type functionality to the class you mix it into.The problem: for reasons of convenience and aesthetics, I want to in
I have several categories that I use in my Grails plugin. e.g., class Foo { static foo(ClassA a,Object someArg) { ... }
How do you access an instance variable within a mixin method? I can think of 2 ways, but both seem problematic.
I just stumbled over a weird problem, and I don\'t really understand what is causing this. In our rails app, let\'s have a mixin Mixin:
Let\'s say I have two classes Foo and Bar, and I want to make Foo friends with Bar without changing Foo. Here\'s my at开发者_高级运维tempt:
I have a set of classes of models, and a set of algorithms that can be run on the models. Not all classes of models can perform all algorithms. I want model classes to be able to declare what algorith
There\'s a less common C++ idiom that I\'ve used to good effect a few times in the past. I just can\'t seem to remember if it has a generally used name to describe it.