I am wondering, why is an included module\'s methods mixed in to any subsequent class definitions (as if the class included it in itself)?
Given that Mixinsgenerally introduce new behaviour into a class, this generally implies that a class would have more than one behaviour.
What I\'d like to achieve is having a proper implementation for def dynamix[A, B](a: A): A with B I may know what B is, but don\'t know what A is (but if B has a self type then I could add some con
I have a Mix-in that reflects on the receiver class to generate some code.This means that I need to execute 开发者_如何学运维the class method at the end of the class definition, like in this trivially
In class Foo I\'d like to include method Bar under certain conditions: modul开发者_如何学JAVAe Bar
Is there a best practice way to pass params to mixed-in methods? The class using the mixin could set up instance variables which mixed-in methods expect, or it could pass all necessary params as argu
I am creating a mixin which renders a javascript file when a textfield gains focus. I am new to the idea of mixins in Tapestry, and I am unsure of where to place my original javascript file which i w
Here\'s part of my Note class: class Note attr_accessor :semitones, :letter, :accidental def initialize(semitones, letter, accidental = :n)
The Decorator Pattern is dynamic extension-at-runtime of classes.It dynamically forms a is-a relationship.
Well obviously开发者_开发知识库 Ruby and Sass, but what are some other ones?Wiki has a list http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mixin#Programming_languages_that_use_mixins
加载中,请稍侯......