I have several database - Elephants, Giraffes, Gorillas, etc - each of which has an Inputs and Results table named ElephantInputs, ElephantResults, GiraffeInputs, GiraffeResults, GorillaInputs, Gorill
First of, I have read many explanations on SO and blogs about covariance and contravariance and a big thanks goes out to Eric Lippert for producing such a great series on Covariance and Contravariance
I have the following class structure: public class A : AInterface { } public interface AInterface { } public class B<T> : BInterface<T> where T : AInterface
I have the following two generic types: interface IRange<T> where T : IComparable<T> interface IRange<T, TData> : IRange<T> where T : IComparable<T>
There are a few posts already on stack overflow about this sort of thing but not exactly the same - so apologies in advance if this is something that has already been answered.
While we can inherit from base class/interface, why can\'t we declare a List<> using same class/interface?
Yesterday at a seminar the presenter (Peter Sestoft) showed a small java program, with 3 classes, featuring both co-variance and contra-variance. When attempting to compile using javac, the type check
I watched a video about it on Channel 9 but I didn\'t really understand it much. Can someone please give me a simple example about these that\'s easy to understand? After that maybe how it would be u
I need to assign 开发者_StackOverflowan array to a field. I dont know the fields type, but I do have a reference to an instance and the name of the field. I can assume the array can be casted to the f
From a book of computer simulation, I got this two equation. The first is to calculate correlogram, the second is how to use correlogram to estimate variance.