I\'m trying to implement the strategy pattern using reflection, i.e. instantiate a new Concrete Strategy object using it\'s class name.
I\'m working out a method to calculate a total for a shopping cart written in PHP and would like some feedback on a good design pattern for handling the different conditions. I am trying to offer the
I\'m implementing a simple strategy pattern (for the first time in ruby) and I want to write a test to make sure that every subclass implements the crucial strategy method. So, I have something like t
In the past, I have seen the strategy pattern explained as a mechanism which allows the user of a function/class to provide their own functionality for that function/class.
Is it normal to use default strategy like in my code below: public abstract class ClContext { protected sealed class InitialAlgorithm : IClAlgorithm
I\'m kind of a beginner when it comes to design patterns. Any thoughts on implementing the strategy pattern/ like this:
I am programming in Java but this is a more of a design question so any OO programmer could probably answer this question.I have a question concerning the Strategy design pattern.Here are several inks
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this po
I am trying to build a software package that fixes arbitrary data inconsistencies in one of my databases. My design includes two classes - Problem and Fix.
Can you give me a concrete example when is preferable to use private inheritance over composition? Personally, I will use composition over private inherita开发者_运维百科nce, but there might be the ca
加载中,请稍侯......