I\'ve become fond of PHP\'s support for the \"short ternary\", omitting the second expression: // PHP $foo = \'hello\';
To allow an Super User/Admin to log in to my system, I am running (a larger version of) this query: Select *
Does it matter how I group subexpressions when dealing with a single short-circuiting operator? a && b && c && d
Given a container of boolean values (An example is std::vector<bool>), is there a standard function that returns true if all the values are true (\"and\") or true if at least one value is true (
is there any performance difference between the following two cases: First: int test_some_condition(void);
Whats the meaning of x AND THEN y AND z is it x AND THEN (y AND z) (y, z gets开发者_如何学Go never evaluated if x is FALSE)
I have some code like this: if var: if var2 == getSomeValue() This could be in a single expression. if var and var2 == getSomeValue():
I am curious why the comma ‹,› is a shortcut for and and not andalso in guard tests. Since I\'d call myself a “C native” I fail to s开发者_高级运维ee any shortcomings of short-circuit boolean eva
I came开发者_如何学运维 across this in a code review: def some_method(self, path): path = os.path.abspath(os.path.expanduser(path or \"\"))
Given the following code: if (is_valid($string) && up_to_length($string) && file_exists($file))
加载中,请稍侯......