This question already has answers here: Why is this name with an underscore not CLS Compliant? 开发者_Go百科(8 answers)
My case is: I\'m working a .net library 开发者_Go百科which wraps an existing C++ library. One method in C++ returns an unsigned int and I also want to return the .net corresponding method with an Sys
I\'m getting the following warning message... Return type of开发者_运维知识库 function \'ConnectionNew\' is not CLS-compliant.
According to CA1026: Default parameters should not be 开发者_StackOverflowused I\'m not supposed to use default parameters.
I have tried to generate a proxy class from WSDL file given using .net 2003. When i tried to add this class file t开发者_开发知识库o my project which is in .net 2003, Its giving error in proxy class l
Background I am writing a managed x64 assembler (which is开发者_运维问答 also a library), so it has multiple classes which define an unsigned 64-bit integer property for use as addresses and offsets.
If i have a property like this [CLSCompliant(false)] public uint Something { ... } and want to write an alternative, i can not just write an overload as i would do for methods.
This new feature is really convenient. Lately I read the document of the \"Microsoft All-In-One Code Framework\", and it mentions that \"Optional Parameters\" is not CLS-Compliant.
Some .net Theory question: Which libraries are actually standardized? I know that there is the Common Type System which specifies things like 32-Bit Integers and all this low level info, but I\'m conf
Im working on a system that allows one to define data types (types that have only public properties) on the fly (undercovers using reflection.emit), i want my new types to also be CLS compliant, what
加载中,请稍侯......