I have a situation where I have to put getters and setters for a sublass reference in superclass. I just need to know whether its a good practice or not?
Let us consider a class \'Human\' -->(1..*) \'Human\' , where Human is a supertype. Say it has subclasses like \'Male\', \'Female\', \'SociallyPathologicalMale\' etc. The basic association b/w 2 entit
I have the following structure in my data: Category0 -SubCategory0 -SubCategory1 -SubCategoryN Category1
Here is situation.... ... I have a DBManager, which is implement a DBInterface, in the DBInterface, I got 4 method:
Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
I am trying to create a class diagram for an application that I am trying to create within a given framework.
I have a unique problem/situation here. Trying to make it as simple as possible. I have a base class (say Parent) and a whole bunch of derived classes (say Child1, Child2 ..ChildN) directly deriving f
Hi Are class methods generally me开发者_C百科asured to be faster than instance methods since it doesn\'t require loading an instance? If so, should we use class methods when possible?
Is there any reason why one would declare a array开发者_高级运维 final? say something like this
At times I find myself struggling to navigate the object landscape of a large, legacy system having 100+ classes.
加载中,请稍侯......