I heard that when I\'m doing this: <a onclick=\'foo()\'></a> behind the scenes, it generates me an anonymous function, or maybe an eval\'d function...? I\'m confused, because I do h开发
I\'ve built a program that stores, retrieves, and eval()s code from a SQLite database. Before I get jumped for my bad coding practices, let\'s just treat this as a theoretical and pretend that I have
I\'m creating a GWT version of a Java library which has support for the javax.script.ScriptEngine to evaluate functions dynamically via Javascript, e.g.,
I\'m coding something like REPL Server. Request from users evaluates in such function: (defn execute [request]
I have a program that is encrypted with Blowfish in a file and a second perl program that prompts for a passphrase tha开发者_运维百科t is used to decrypt it into a string, I would like to not have to
I\'m dealing with a situation where I need to bind jQuery events to a page to handle UI updates that is being generated via JSF. Alas, JSF sucks and it sticks onclick events on everything, which pre-e
Here is the code that came across with: function popUp(URL) { day = new Date(); id = day.getTime(); eval(\"page\" + id + \" = window.open(URL, \'\" + id + \"\',\'....;\");
What are the common pitfalls associated with Perl\'s eval, whic开发者_如何转开发h might make you choose to use a module such as Try::Tiny?Perl\'s eval comes in two flavors, string eval and block eval.
So there\'s a php function in a database field. Here\'s what it looks like: \'$put_fname_fn = function($filename) {
I have function:开发者_StackOverflow function selects($sql,$tmpl) { preg_match_all(\'/{[^}]*}/\', $tmpl, $m);