I\'ll start by saying is going to be a little tougher than blindly joining byte[] together. My big picture goal is to optimize an application that currently uploads many 512byte pages to a web server
I\'m currently reading the CLR specification. I have a bit of trouble understanding section \"I 8.2.4 Boxing and unboxing of values\".
There is code: struct A { int b; } class B { A a; int b; } Questions are: Is a in B boxed or not? Is a in B located in stack or in heap?
The definition of Nullable<T> is: [SerializableAttribute] public struct Nullable<T> where T : struct开发者_StackOverflow中文版, new()
I have 3 classes: class A { public B b = new B(); public bool flag {get; set;} } class B { piblic开发者_StackOverflow C c = new C();
When I first saw the value types in C#, the first thing I thought was \"wow, what a great optimization\", the second thing is, \"do we really need a new language construct? can\'t we do that with anno
Take the following example: string me = \"Ibraheem\"开发者_StackOverflow社区; string copy = me; me = \"Empty\";
This question already has answers here: Closed 11 years ago. Possible Duplicate: In C#, why is String 开发者_运维百科a reference type that behaves like a value type?
G\'Day, Apologies for the length of the post, however the code is necessary. I would like to create my own value types in C#. I have implemented a struct TCountryID but it appears I am still missin
Out of curiosity, is the following a bug or intended behavior? It seems IMHO strange that the def开发者_高级运维ault argument of an integer parameter is null.
加载中,请稍侯......