In Haskell, is there a way to restrict a monad M a so that a satisfy a type class constraint? I am translating the probabilistic modeling example from F# to Haskell. However, in Haskell, I omitted su
Coming from (SWI) Prolog I find it very difficult to have Haskell give output on the fly. The simplest example, I\'d like Haskell to print something on every iteration:
I have occasionally encountered a pattern in code which resembles a monad but does not keep a consistent type across >>=.
I\'m implementing a combinatorial optimization algorithm in Haskell: Given an initial candidate solution, repeat until st开发者_如何学JAVAopping criteria are met:
Applicatives compose, monads don\'t. What does the above state开发者_运维问答ment mean? And when is one preferable to other?If we compare the types
Suppose I have two Options and, if both are Some, execute one code path, and if note, execute another.I\'d like to do something like开发者_如何学Python
What\'s the differ开发者_开发百科ence? Does seq guarantee more flow conditions?They aren\'t related at all.
So, I have a system of stateful processors that are chained together. For example, a processor might output the average of its last 10 inputs. It requires state to calculate this average.
I would like to define a monad instance with the container M as monad and with the contained type a which should be a member of class Show. This constraint (that a is member of Show) should be ensured
How is IO monad actually implemented?in sense of, what would be the actual implementation of the main function?开发者_如何学运维
加载中,请稍侯......