I\'ve installed MacRuby (via rvm): $ ruby -v MacRuby 0.10 (ruby 1.9.2) [universal-darwin10.0, x86_64] And LLVM (via homebrew):
I want to implement push and pop operations in LLVM assembly. The alloca instruction does not follow the concept of stack, push and pop.
I would like to know why an unused variable is bad. Is it because the compiler would create a bigger binary? If yes, is there a t开发者_StackOverflow社区ool/script which can add an unused keyword or s
I have written a small piece of code to generate an LLVM module containing a few global variables. I am converting the module to LLVM assembly code using the LLVM assembler and then to native binary b
I have compiled some C functions into LLVM bytecode. Now I\'d like to make these functions accessible to a Lua script engine and then compile a Lua script into native machine code.
I like the LLVM idea.To be honest, I do not much care for Ruby, I\'d rather use Perl, or Python, or .... ( it\'s a long list ).
I am, for some time, experimenting with LLVM, simply because. It does, however, consume more of my time than I thought.
From http://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#ci_rtti_exceptions LLVM does make extensive use of a hand-rolled form of RTTI that use
I can\'t seem to find reference to intrinsics in the official LLVM OCaml binding, beyond t开发者_如何转开发he is_intrinsic function.
I have a compiler which targets LLVM, and I provide two ways to run the code: Run it automatically. This mode compiles the code to LLVM and uses the ExecutionEngine JIT to compile it into machine co