I开发者_运维技巧 am reading the paper Generics of a Higher Kind, the first sentence is With Java 5 and C# 2.0, first-order
Why is pure untyped lambda calculus often described as being impossible to use? With a suitable library of functions would it not be about the same as any other function开发者_如何学运维al language?S
I am facing the following Prolog code. The expression [X]>>Y stands for the lambda expression lambda X.Y. The code eliminates the lambda
I have problems understanding lambda calculus operators precedence. For example the following code: lambda x.x z lambda y.x y
I have the following开发者_StackOverflow社区 (f.x.f(f x))(y.y+1) = x.(y.y+1)((y.y+1) x) = x.(y.y+1)(x+1)
In order to learn what a fixed-point combinator is and is used for, I wrote my own. But instead of writing it with strictly anonymous functions, like Wikipedia\'s example, I just used define:
I would like to parse a lambda calculus. I dont know how to parse the term and respectparenthesis priority. Ex:
So i\'m totally stuck on this one part of a problem. It would be awesome if someone could help.........
I\'m using F# to create a lambda calculus. I am currently stuck trying to figure out how I would implement the fixed-point operator (also called Y combinator).
I can understand how to create and think about the SKI and BCKW calculus, but I am never able to find practical uses.开发者_运维问答Maybe I am not looking deeply enough?That is, I wonder if (an exampl
加载中,请稍侯......