Here is the snippet: prog1: HANDLE hM; hM = CreateMutexA(NULL,TRUE, \"abc\"); // I have to use TRUE otherwise WaitForSingleObject fails.. by design it wants to take ownership and w//o TRUE there is n
I wanted to use a thread to do something that could not return immediately when i click a button called button1
What is the correct way to terminate a worker thread if it is taking too long to complete? I\'ve read several articles claming that TerminateThread should be used with extreme caution, but I can\'t fi
I have thread A that is creating another thread B, than thread A is waiting using WaitForSingleObject to wait until thread B dies.
I\'m developing with VC2005, and I\'m having a problem with a thread. I have a thread that dequeue data from a queue and send it. But this thread send one petition and have to wait for the answer to
I am having problems closing an application that uses WaitForSingleObject() with an INFINITE timout. The full picture is this.I am doing the following to allow my application to handle the device wak
h=CreateFile(\"c:\\\\tes开发者_JAVA百科t.txt\",GENERIC_READ,FILE_SHARE_READ,NULL,OPEN_ALWAYS,FILE_ATTRIBUTE_READONLY|FILE_FLAG_OVERLAPPED,NULL);
I\'m having trouble which boils down to wishing CreateProcess were StartProcess. The trouble is that there are circumstances under which CreateProcess returns true when it created the process but the
Actua开发者_如何学Clly i am using this code and works ok, but i \'am wondering if is the correct way.
I am implementing a Go Back N protocol for a networking class. I am using WaitForSingleObject to know when the socket on my receiver thread has data inside it:
加载中,请稍侯......