Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this po
Is there any way (hack) to push Python function (def) to return results by reference even for immutable types?
For example I want to declare let len, (*mutable*) i = if s.Length >= 2 && s.[0] = \'0\' && (s.[1] = \'x\' || s.[1] = \'X\') then
So I have functions like read that can be called at the same time from multiple threads. butalso I have a function to write that needs to lock all that read functions. Where to get example of creating
For some reason I just cant seem to get my head around the process of creating a C-Array instance variable for a class that can have elements added to it dynamically at runtime.
I have strings stored in various objects, for example a, b, c[2:7] (ie 5 different strings c[2],...c[6]), d.s, e.s[:] (ie all strings stored in the e.s list). I need to loop over all these strings on
The Context The context of this question is that I want to play around with Gene Expression Programming (GEP), a form of evolutionary algorithm, using Erlang. GEP makes use of a string based D开发者_
I\'ve got a question but to get an answer the following fact has first to be accepted: in some cases, Java Strings can be modified.
I try to build a list of (mutable and immutable) Sets. The compiler gets into trouble as it cannot figure out the type of that list. I always thought that I can connect Lists of any types and that the
This question is about the Data.Vector package. Given the fact that I\'ll never use the old value of a certain cell once the cell is updated. Will the update operation always create a new vector, ref
加载中,请稍侯......