I\'ve got an interesting issue with type comparison. I\'m attempting to compare an implied type with an explicit type, to test if something is any sort of collection
I understand that implicitly-typed local variables must be initialized. I know 开发者_StackOverflow中文版that result will be an IList so could I somehow say that var result will be an IList?
I have the following code: Func<string, bool> comparer = delegate(string value) { return value != \"0\";
I have a unit test method: private bool TestCompatibility(string type1, string type2, bool should开发者_如何学运维BeCompatible)
After rewriting my event invocation function to handle the events and their arguments generically, I started going over my code (to match the change), and I noticed that the compiler implicitly made t
I\'ve written a custom trait which extends Iterator[A] and I\'d like to be able to use the methods 开发者_如何学JAVAI\'ve written on an Iterator[A] which is returned from another method.Is this possib
In a book I\'m reading it states the implicit typing makes the following code clearer than if you didn\'t use the var k开发者_StackOverflow中文版eyword:
I was under the impression that the C# compiler will implicitly type an array based off a type that they can all be implicitly converted to.
I\'ve been developing .NET applications for 4 years. So far, I did not need to create a开发者_C百科ny implicit conversions for the classes I authored.
Is it possible to configure the implicit typing rule in Oracle Server (at least version 10g) ? If not a link to the documentation of the rules and how Oracle parameters impa开发者_StackOverflow中文版c
加载中,请稍侯......