I am curious about why bucket sort has a runtime of O(n + k) if we use buckets implemented with linked lists.For example, suppose that we have this input:
A while back, I learned a little bit about big O notation and the efficiency of different algorithms.
Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
collection.Where(i => i.condition) .ToList() .ForEach(i => SomeComplicatedOpInvolving_i); I\'m not looking for answers telling me there is an easier way of doing this, just treat it as a thoug
I have a large set of data that I want to cycle through in order to determine various statistics on the data set from a point in time \'D1\' to a point in time in the future \'D2\'. Basically, I want
Today I was reading a great article from Julienne Walker about sorting - Eternally Confuzzled - The Art of Sorting and one thing caught my eye. I don\'t quite understand the part where the author prov
One of my favorite interview questions is In O(n) time and O(1) space, determine whether a linked list contains a cycle.
I wrote a simple program that sorts in O(n). It is highly memory inefficient, but that\'s not the point.
Can an algorithm having a time complexity of O(n) have a space complexity of O(n2) or more tha开发者_如何学Pythonn that?The space complexity cannot be more than the time complexity because writing X u
Wikipedia says: The statement \"f(x) is O(g(x))\" as defined above is usually written as f(x) = O(g(x)). Some consider this to be an abuse of notation, since
加载中,请稍侯......