Salute.. I have an unusual problem. Here in this table in MSDN library we can see that precedence of () is higher than ++ (Pre-increment) .
I have problems understanding lambda calculus operators precedence. For example the following code: lambda x.x z lambda y.x y
Wikipedia claims that the [] operator precedes the * operator in evaluation. Then, why does the following statement:
In Zed Shaw\'s Learn Python the Hard Way (page 15-16), he has an example exercise 100 - 25 * 3 % 4 the result is 97 (try it!)
I am trying to make a C++ compiled model for simple SQL commands. For example this could be a part of my main function which i must be able to handle :
This question already has answers here: Closed 12 years ago. Possible Duplicates: Output of multiple post and pre increments in one statement
This code is taken from a discussion going on here. someInstance.Fun(++k).Gun(10).Sun(k).Tun(); Is this code well-defined? Is ++k in Fun() evaluated before k in Sun()?
This question already has answers here: Difference between pre-increment and post-increment in a loop?
In the C programing language, why do the bitwise operators (& and |) have lower precedence than 开发者_运维问答the equality operator (==)? It does not make sense to me.You need to ask Brian Kernig
I\'m writing a small parser, which will have an OR operator and an AND operator. When you see a series of ORs and ANDs, which do you expect will be more bi开发者_开发百科nding? Given the expression a
加载中,请稍侯......