Consider this loop: int[] myArray = new int[10]; int myIndex = 0; for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++开发者_开发知识库)
let\'s assume I have the followin code #define CHECK(result) do{\\ if(result == 0)\\ return false;\\ } while(0)
This question already has answers here: Closed 11 years ago. Possible Duplicate: why “++x || ++y && ++z” calculate “++x” firstly ? however,Operator “&
Why are the parentheses needed here? Are there some precedence rules I should know? scala> \'x\' match { case _ => 1 } + 1
I\'m confused about direct assignment and ternary conditional operators precedence: #include<stdio.h>
This question already has answers here:开发者_Python百科 Closed 11 years ago. Possible Duplicate: C Preprocessor, Stringify the result of a macro
class base { public: base(){ cout << \"base constructor\" << endl; } base(const base& rh) {
This question already has answers here: Closed 11 years ago. Pos开发者_如何学Pythonsible Duplicate:
I would like to prefer a certain implicit conversion sequence over another. I have the following (greatly simplified) class and functions:
If an expression evaluates multiple && operators, and 开发者_如何学Cdoes not evaluate any operators of lower precedence (eg. ||, ?:), will the expression evaluate to 0 as soon as one of the &a
加载中,请稍侯......