Is there any easy way to have a system-wide mutex in Python on Linux? By \"system-wide\", I mean the mutex will be used by a group of Python开发者_如何学JAVA processes; this is in contrast to a tradit
As a part of a project I\'m writing a logger function. This logger function sends an e-mail when the program wants to log something. Since it has happened that the SMTP server was non responsive, I\'v
Let\'s say I have a simple code like this functionA(){ lock(l开发者_如何学PythonockA); //doing something with a shared data;
Using the topic Overview - Handle Enumeration, number 5, the attempt Close mutex of another process and and information from Mutex analysis, the canary in the coal mine and discovering new families of
A coworker and I write software for a variety of platforms running on x86, x64, Itanium, PowerPC, and other 10 year old server CPUs.
I need two threads to progress in a \"tick tock\" pattern.When implmented with a semaphore this looks fine:
I have a basic question on mutext handling. I have a file which appears at 2 other threads(out of 3). I need to mutually exclude access to it by a thread. So I do the following in a function called fr
I have a program that should get the maximum out of my cpu. It is multithreaded via pthreads that do their job well apart from the fact that t开发者_运维知识库hey \"only\" get my cores to about 60% l
I have some doubts wether mutexes are enough to ensure thread safety of the following code example or if atomics are required. In short question is: Would making idxActive a regular int make this code
Regarding this: How To Use Condition Variable Say we have number of consumer threads that execute such code (copied from the referenced page):
加载中,请稍侯......