I am in a multi-threaded situation and I have a function that I want to be run from only one thread at a time. However, rather than serializing the function in the tradition manner, I want any threads
Boost version - 1.47 I can not find boost::interprocess::interprocess_sharable_mutex, but it looks like it is forward declared. Is this really supported ?
I started using boost::thread recently (WinXP, VS10, BoostPro) and found that mutex can be unlocked by any thread, not by the thread that owns it only.
As the mutex in most of the systems are implemented using CAS ops, I was wondering about performance comparison of these two constructs.
Is there a well defined behavior for POSIX mutex ownership in case of Thread exits Thread crashes Thread crashes due to exception
I want to understand if the foll开发者_如何学Cowing code is correct #include <iostream> #include <boost/thread/thread.hpp>
I have the following code: void Func() {开发者_如何学运维 boost::interprocess::named_mutex someMutex(boost::interprocess::open_or_create, \"MyMutex\");
Motivation:reason why I\'m considering it is that my genius project manager thinks that boost is another dependency and that it is horrible because \"you depend on it\"(I tried explaining the quality
So I have functions like read that can be called at the same time from multiple threads. butalso I have a function to write that needs to lock all that read functions. Where to get example of creating
I think I have a problem in my program. I must create an object that continuosly communicate with an external tracking system and get coordinates of point from it.
加载中,请稍侯......