I have two programs interacting via a shared memory seg开发者_JS百科ment.When using the segment for read or write, they hold a lock.
Not sure if this is a style question, or something that has a hard rule... If I want to keep the public method interface as const as possible, but make the object thread safe, should I use mutable mu
I want my application to open only one process, i.e. if the one process is already opened and the user want to open the exe again - it won\'t o开发者_开发知识库pen another process.
I use the .Net Mutex class to lock parts of my app across threads. I\'m having some deadlock issues, and it would be very helpful if I could find out the name of the thread that c开发者_Go百科urrently
I can initialize a mutex in static memory with an initializer: pthread_mutex_t mymutex = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;
Something I don\'t get about the classical algorithm for the Producer-Consumer problem (from Wikipedia:)
This is mainly about the understanding of the concept, which confuses me. Mutex means that one thread takes the control of the access of shared resource, performs operations and unlocks it, then only
It seems that this question gets asked frequently, but I am not coming to any definitive conclusion. I need a little help on determining whether or not I should (or must!) implement locking code when
The situation is that I want to allow users to open multiple instances of the program but I do not want more than one logged on user to use the program at once. So, for开发者_高级运维 instance if the
I\'ve been reading up on multithreading and shared resources access and one of the many (for me) new concepts is the mutex lock. What I can\'t seem to find out is what is actually happening to the thr
加载中,请稍侯......