I\'m trying to find the fastest possible and lock free solution for one producer-many consumers scenario. I assume that when dealing with only one producer and values can be lost in between we need to
I\'m writing a simple producer/cons开发者_JAVA百科umer program to better understand c++ and multithreading.
I am trying to translate the scenario below using threads. procA { while (TRUE) { update(x); retrieve(y);
# file1.py class _Producer(self): def __init__(self): self.chunksize = 6220800 with open(\'/dev/zero\') as f:
public class MainClass { private static final int producerPoolSize = 10; private static final int consumerPoolSize = 20;
public class MainClass { private static final int size = 5; private ExecutorService prodExec = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(size);
I am testing a simple producer/ consumer example in android this is what i\'m doing. I have two EditText boxes, one being a producer and the other a consumer. The app also has a single button once th
My understanding of a Producer-Consumer pattern is that it could be implemented using a queue shared between the producer and the consumer. Producer submits work to a shared queue, consumer retrieves
Is there a mechanism to have a conditional variable use multiple mutexes? I am in Linux and pthreads in C++.
So lately I\'ve been reading a lot of article about how concurrent programming is hard, and how concurrent programming with shared state is near impossible.So languages like Erlang (I think this is on
加载中,请稍侯......