From my course instructor, he has repeatedly emphasized and asked us开发者_运维知识库 not to use the \"inline\" keyword for functions. He says it is not \"portable\" across compilers and is not \"stan
. Here I was discussing Empty Base Optimization, and MSalters made this interesting comment: No class can ever have
I was reading about Empty Base Optimization(EBO). While reading, the following questions popped up in my mind:
Is it possible to good C compiler with high optimization enabled to optimize code with prefetches and to place prefetches before some function call:
I remember reading somewhere that to really optimize & speed up certain section of the code, programmers write that section in Assembly language. My questions are -
The const a开发者_开发知识库nd volatile chapter on the \'Surviving the Release Version\' Article gave me the idea that the compiler can use the const keyword as hint for its optimization job.
I have a Scheme function who\'s basic form looks like this (define (foo param var) (cond ((end-condition) (return-something))
So lately I have been toying around with how Mathematica\'s pattern matching and term rewriting might be put to good use in compiler optimizations...trying to highly optimize short blocks of code that
This is kind of a noob question. I have a simple property bool IsRoot { get { return parent==null; } }
I\'m wondering which optimizations of Java Compiler开发者_Go百科s can be usually blocked (or not detected) because of non-clear or badly written code, and what kind of commong mistakes are made that o
加载中,请稍侯......