I have an unusual situation: I have an assembler file, which has .c extension and I cannot change build scripts, where this file is defined as \"C\" type. However, I can build it with the same GCC opt
I want to realize logging in my project. I have macro, smth like __LOG_TRACE(lg, expr,...) LOG_TRACE_STREAM(lg) <&开发者_JAVA百科lt; expr;
I would like to do the following, but the compiler doesn\'t like it: unsigned short foo = 1; // do something with foo
This question already has answers here: What is the purpose of a these #define within an enum? (5 answers)
This question is unlikely to help any future visitors; it is only relevant to 开发者_如何学编程a small geographic area, a specific moment in time,or an extraordinarily narrow situation that is not
I\'m building a tree-based debug/logging system for C++. Its开发者_如何学C \"user interface\" is a macro which passes user-defined message and call site information (file, line, object address) to sp
bool xHasReached(double tX, double dstX, bool incX) { return incX ? tX &g开发者_高级运维t; (dstX - (double)EPSILON) : tX < (dstX + (double)EPSILON);}
I may be trying to abuse the preprocessor. I want to see if what I have in mind is even possible. My class has @properties that all have the same bodies. I want to generate these bodies with a prepro
I\'m implementing Share开发者_如何学运维Kit in my app. In the SHKConfig.h file, in the section where the Facebook data is inserted, there is a line saying: #define SHKFacebookSessionProxyURL @\"\".
I\'m implementing ShareKit in my app; I defined in the SHKConfig.h the following definitions: #define SHKMyAppName @\"MyAppName\"