I have a question regarding this article. Between this code function odds(n, p) { if(n == 0) { return 1 } else {
I have the following Clojure code to calculate a number with开发者_如何学Go a certain \"factorable\" property. (what exactly the code does is secondary).
Can I build iterative process using recursive call in and statement? For example, purpose, we have function fo开发者_JAVA技巧o that doesn\'t do anything. What kind of process it will create (iterativ
I read in an algorithmic book that the Ackermann function cannot be made tail-recursive (what they say is \"it can\'t be transformed into an iteration\"). I\'m pretty perplex about this, so I tried an
If I understand correctly, scala.util.control.TailCalls can be used to avoid stack overflows for non-tail-recursive functions by using a trampoline. The example given in the API is straightforward:
This question already has answers here: Closed 12 years ago. Possible D开发者_如何学Gouplicate: Why does the JVM still not support tail-call optimization?
Rich Hickey and others have mentioned that Clojure will not get a significant improvement from the upcoming invokeDynamic planned for JVM 7 or 8, but will see a performance gain from tail recursion.
I\'m using the following control structure(which I think is tail recursive) untilSuccessOrBigError :: (Eq e) => (Integer -> (Either e a)) -> Integer -> e -> (Either e a)
I have a Scheme function who\'s basic form looks like this (define (foo param var) (cond ((end-condition) (return-something))
A factorial of a natural number (any number greater or equal than 0) is that number multiplied by the factorial of itself minus one, where the factorial of 0 is defined as 1.
加载中,请稍侯......