I have this method private def getAddresses(data: List[Int], count: Int, len: Int): Tuple2[List[Address], List[Int]] = {
If I call this function with a very high initial currentReflection value I get a stack overflow exception, which indicates that the function is not tail-recursive (correct?). My understanding was that
I\'m unsure of how to turn count-forwards into a tail-recursive program. It takes a non-negative number, n, and returns the list of integers from 0 t开发者_如何学Goo n (including n).
I\'m working on the following Erlang exercise: Write a function that, given a list of lists, will concatenate them. Example:
I\'m working on a homework assignment, consisting of 2 parts. The first is to write a Prolog program that checks if a certain pair X, Y belongs to a http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triangular_number. For
Hey guys, I\'m trying to get cozy with functional programming (particularly with F#), and I\'ve hit a wall when it comes to building tail-recursive functions. I\'m pretty good with turning basic recur
I wrote a function to calculate the power of an integer then take modulus. I wonder if what I did is tail recursion :
Is tail recursion better than forward recursion for perfomance in erlang? Or er开发者_C百科lang compiler optimizes forward recursion too?
I\'ve been playing with OCaml recently, and promptly did my favourite thing to check how well developed a VM/Compiler really is, and wrote a recursive Program:
Why won\'t the Scala compiler apply tail call optimization unless a method is final? For example, this:
加载中,请稍侯......