I\'m doing some offline development on my SVN working copy. Since I won\'t have access to the SVN r开发者_StackOverflow中文版epository for a while, I wanted to use Bazaar as a helper version control t
We can see all the changesets and the files involved using hg outgoing -v but the filenames are all scattered in the l开发者_如何学编程ist of changesets.
Using Mercurial (hg), can you just \"hg backout\" all the commits you did for the files you don\'t want to push, and then do a push?
Two uses of version control seem to dictate different checkin styles. distribution centric: changesets will generally reflect a complete feature.In general these check开发者_运维知识库ins will be la
In Mercurial, what i开发者_开发百科s the command to say 1) make all my files as of two months ago (say, April 16, 6:03pm) (Revision 328 as seen from the hg log)
It seems that it is suggested we can commit often to keep track of intermediate changes of code we wrote… such as on hginit.com, when using Mercurial or Git.
I\'m currently signed up with a third party service that hosts my mercurial repositories as a central hub to push my changes to as a sort of backup.
Using Git or Mercurial, if the working directory is 1GB, then the local repository will be another 1GB (at least), residing normally in the same hard drive.And then when pushed to a central repository
Obviously bzr clone, bzr branch and bzr checkout all do the same thing when given an URL as parameter and executed in a non-bzr directory.
Using Git or Mercurial, how would you know when you do a clone or a pull, no one is checking in files (pushing it)?It can be important that:
加载中,请稍侯......