I noticed that this ki开发者_运维问答nd of functionality exists for subversion and it works very nicely. I was wondering if there is such thing for SourceGear Vault.Nope, I\'m afraid we only have two-
We started using Mercurial a several weeks ago. Most developers follow this workflow: work on a feature
Using Mercurial, say if I do an hg pull and hg up and now the local repo and working directory are both up to date.
I\'m intrigued by git. I\'ve used nearly all of the usual players over the past decades. Currently on SVN and not really happy.
I heard that if we are working on a feature and then we need to fix something quickly, we can make a temporary clone and then fix the bug, and push to the central repo.
I wanna have this structure: project/# The overall repository, *and* the project\'s mainline branch + joe/# Developer Joe\'s primary branch of development
I\'m working on a website with some other people. Usually when we want to modify something, we do the change on our machine and just upload the new version with ftp, hope it\'ll works (or that nobody
I\'ve been using TortoiseHG for some time now and I\'ve been running into the same issue once in a while.
Imagine because of tradition that your team\'s preferred development method involved several people with a shared login, editing files on a build 开发者_StackOverflowserver using vim.
I\'m currently involved in a large project - the redevelopment of a corporate website. The project involves many staff across several teams (content, design, etc).
加载中,请稍侯......