i\'m trying to understand java behaviour. Using this interfaces : public interface IA {} public interface IB extends IA {}
I was wondering if the following is possible. Create a class that accepts an anonymous type (string, int, decimal, customObject, etc), then have overloaded methods that do different operations based o
I\'m looking for an easy way to build an array of strings at compile time. For a test, I put together a class named Strings that has the following members:
I\'ve got the following structure: structA { A(); virtual ~A(); virtual voidFoo() =0; }; structE; structF; structB:public A
In Scala, you can overload a method by having methods that share a common name, but which either have different arities or different parameter types.I was wondering why this wasn\'t also extended to t
In Objective-C, I have a category for a class: @interface UILabel(CustomInit) - (id)initWithCoder:(NSCoder *)coder;
加载中,请稍侯......