In Ruby def my_func(foo,bar,*zim) [foo, bar, zim].collect(&:inspect) end puts my_func(1,2,3,4,5) # 1 # 2
If you add a third signature for a method, do you make the second and third variations directly call the first (the implemented variation), or do you make the third call the second and the second call
#include <iostream> #include &开发者_开发问答lt;fstream> class obj { public: int i; friend ostream& operator<<(ostream& stream, obj o);
I have two static methods that I want to use for error handling. One of which passes the exception object and the other is just used if needing to report an error which would be a text based message (
In my project, I have defined the an开发者_运维百科 annotation similar to the following: (Omitting @Retention, @Target for brevity)
I\'m tasked with creating a model of a cage of hardware.Each cage contains N slots, each slot may or may not contain a card.
I may have this wrong, but I\'ve seen the way of creating an overloaded method that calls itself in the definition. It\'s something like:
I need a method that takes an Action (or a Func), but the Action has a mixed number of parameters. What is the most straight forward and compact way to implement these overloads:
While working on my basic vector library, I\'ve been trying to use a nice syntax for swizzle-based printing. The problem occurs when attempting to print a swizzle of a different dimension than the vec
I\'m trying to get a better understanding of general practice... specifically deriving this() in a constructor.I understand that its less code, but I consider it less readable.Is it common/g开发者_Sta
加载中,请稍侯......