Say we have a class like this: import java.net.URL import xml._ class SearchData(xml: Node) { def this(url: URL) = this (XML.load(url))
We have a base class: Filter.DistrFilter and ReportFilter inherit from Filter. In another class, FilterService.cs, we have two functions that accept these three class types. FilterService operates on
I wish to use a set of libraries written in C++ with the Intel compilers. I\'ve attached sample code which demonstrates the problem. There are many places in the libraries where they make use of combi
For example, Java\'s own String.format() supports a variable number of arguments. String.format(\"Hello %s! ABC %d!\", \"World\", 123);
currently I’m playing around with rvalue reference (C++11, g++ with gnu++x0) and I want to implement move semantics in my classes, because it just feels „right“.
I\'m doing some numerical simulations where it is nice to overload operations on vectors (similar to valarrays). For example, I can write
Can/should an overloaded operator have to be inlined to gain better efficiency (wrt time or what开发者_运维技巧ever) if that operator will have to be used frequently?
I wondering why the generic overloading is not allowed, and it results in a compiler error of \"ambiguous\" resolution.
I understand that if there are several function with the same name and开发者_如何学C same number of parameters the compiler is trying to find the best match (am I right so far?)
Considering the following code: namespace MyApp { using System; using System.Collections.ObjectModel; class Program
加载中,请稍侯......