In Python one can do: d = {1 : \'Hello\', 2 : \'World\'} In C# it\'s more verbose: Dictionary<int, string> d = new Dictionary<开发者_如何学Python;int, string>();
Not really knowing Perl, I have been enhancing a Perl script with help from a friendly search engine.
Sometimes I see methods in Ruby that have \"?\" and \"!\" at the end of them, e.g: name = \"sample_string\"
Is there a prettier / less-verbose way to use iterators in C++? From the tutorials I\'ve seen, I eithe开发者_JAVA百科r set up typedefs everywhere (which gets tedious to do for a lot of one-off for-loo
Consider: class Foo { static Foo() { // Static initialisation } } Why are the () required in static Foo() {...}? The static constructor must always be parameterless, so why bother? Are they necessa
I\'ve noticed that the new ExpandoObject implemen开发者_运维问答ts IDictionary<string,object> which has the requisite IEnumerable<KeyValuePair<string, object>> and Add(string, object
The compiler compiles a foreach loop into something like a for loop when the foreach is used with an array. Andthecompiler compiles a foreach loop into something like a while loop when the foreach is
is there a way we can import a class under another name? Like if i have a class called javax.C and another class called java.C i can import javax.C under the name C1 and import java.C under the name C
I have been looking into Ruby and find its keywords \"until\" and \"unless\" very interesting. So I thought 开发者_如何学JAVAwhat was a good way to add similar keywords into C/C++. This is what I came
I\'m not sure this is ev开发者_如何学JAVAen possible, but let\'s see if one of you comes up with a solution. This is more or less about code quality in terms of readability and not an actual problem b
加载中,请稍侯......