In Scheme, how can I make use of the define/lambda shorthand for nested lambda expressions within my define?
I will use a simple example to illustrate my question. In Java, C, or any other OOP language, I could create a pie class in a way similar to this:
Let\'s say I have a procedure foo that takes three arguments, and returns a list of them all doubled:
I had never really thought about whether a symbol c开发者_运维技巧ould be a number in Lisp, so I played around with it today:
C开发者_运维百科losed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citati
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
In SICP exercise 2.26, this Scheme code is given: (define x (list 1 2 3)) (define y (list 4 5 6)) Then this cons call is given:
I need to translate some code f开发者_JS百科rom Scheme to Common Lisp.Now, I have something like this:
I am new to Scheme, by looking at the Exercise 1.5 of SICP, what is the meaning/usage开发者_如何学C of this expression?
I am learning scheme. I know how to use both lambda and let expressions. However I\'m struggling to figure out what the point is of using lambda. Can\'t you do everything with let that you can with l
加载中,请稍侯......