I find myself (too) often using a construct like the following: class MyClass { public TypeA ObjectA; public TypeB ObjectB;
I have read that Scala\'s type inference is not global so that is why people must place type annotations on the methods.(Would this be \"local\"开发者_StackOverflow type inference?)
What I mean is this: scala> class Bounded[T <: String](val t: T) defined class Bounded scala> val b: Bounded[_] = new Bounded(\"some string\")
Is there开发者_如何转开发 some vendor-specific type inference mechanism in Microsoft Visual C++ 2008, similar to the standardized auto or decltype in C++0x?No, nothing like that, standard nor vendor s
Does anyone know if subj will be implemented? At le开发者_如何学运维ast, auto storage class for them?
Why does the C# compiler not infer the fact that FooExt.Multiply() satisfies the signature of Functions.Apply()? I have to specify a separate delegate variable of type Func<Foo,int,int> for the
Numeric literals have a polymorphic type: *Main> :t 3 3 :: (Num t) => t But if I bind a variable to such a literal, the polymorphism is lost:
When is it advisable to let the compiler do its thing and when should I be开发者_JAVA技巧 explicit when declaring variable types?Easy, in F#, always prefer to let the compiler \"do its thing\". The fo
Consider the two lambda functions in the following VC++ 10.0 code: template <typename T> void eq(uint fieldno, T value) {
I am working in the .NET 2.0 framework. I have some code working, just want it working a little more elegantly.
加载中,请稍侯......