When does the Scala compiler really need the type information of parameters of anonymous functions? For instance, given this function:
I\'m trying to write a generic filtering function that performs linear interpolation at a given sampling coordinate in an 开发者_如何学运维multi-dimensional array (arbitrary rank). For this, I need a
I\'m quite new to F# and find type inference really is a cool thing. But currently it seems that it also may lead to code duplication, which is not a cool thing. I want to sum the digits of a number l
Consider the situation where a function template needs to forward an argument while keeping it\'s lvalue-ness in case it\'s a non-const lvalue, but is itself agnostic to what the argument actually is,
As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references,or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, a
I\'m trying to come up with an implementation for NotOfType, which has a readable call syntax. NotOfType should be the complement to OfType<T> and would consequently yield all elements that are
I\'m trying out a very light-weight encoding of combinator calculus in scala. Initially, I\'m simply implementing the S and K combinators, application and constant values. Later I hope to lift scala f
I\'m using scala-2.8.1 and scalaz-5.0. Can anyone explain exactly why a PartialApply1Of2 can be inferrred in the one case but not in the other?
Why must I provide explicitly generic parameter types While the compiler should infer the type? public static T2 Cast<T1,T2>(this 开发者_如何学GoT1 arg) where T2 : class where T1 : class
Eric Lippert has written an article about Why no var o开发者_Go百科n fields? in C#. I was curious, will we be able to do that in C++0x? ex.
加载中,请稍侯......